Democracy is not a tool

We are being thought that democracy is the ultimate tool used for governing. But let’s look at it again, should it be a tool or perhaps an effect of the governmental activities. It is quite obvious that over the centuries with the different styles of democracy, there was always place for corruption making democracy more of the label rather than reality. Closest to the democratic principles were people of Greece, dated more than two millennia ago. With no media, people just met in the central square and discussed politics among themselves, where in the place of the talking heads today, they had outspoken demagogs – corruptive manipulation was at its minimum. Today corruption is so interwoven into the society that is not even considered as negative, almost every aspect of our lives is controlled by some kind of knowing better body, in an effect people become passive mass molded to any shape by all present media – the process is called democracy. Now what democracy really is, is ability of every individual to convey to the rest of the society of his or hers untainted by the society itself point of view, now is it possible? Probably not. So what is the solution? In the environment that humanity is at the present, there is no perfect solution, only maybe optimal solution, where society will asymptotically go closer and closer (if it does not destroy itself first) to the utopia but will never reach it. Democracy is a utopia… In almost any ethical political system (system that is not governed by set of rules but human ethics), the side-effect will be democracy. It is not possible to define democracy by creating rules, just like it is not possible to create utopia, but both democracy and utopia are possible if we just would be honest with ourselves and follow rules that come from following our heart rather than so called wise-man. I do not think it is hard to imagine by anyone that societal honesty leads to democracy, one just have to step out, out of themselves and open one’s mind. So the question is: Are we capable of being honest with ourselves?

Righteous R1a1a7

How do we account for survival of principles of righteousness in Poland? And yes, it is not what it was centuries ago but put against the background of other cultures, that surround Poland, it is still peaking. Since the subject is DNA, with its time constant of mutation very slow, we should go back in anthropology of our people as much back in time as possible and look for consistencies. Chronicles of Prokosz is most complete, it is not considered by major historians as it does not follow the mainstream line of thought developed in 19^th century. This forum however is more of the revisionist type as it considers new findings rather than disregards them if they do not follow historical authorities. Other countries chronicles are in line of what Prokosz is saying, so by the law of statistics it should be considered. Poland of 18^th and 19^th centuries was under occupation of the neighboring countries and it was in those countries interest to manipulate the past – that happened, lots of proof for that. Looking into the most recent history of WWII, it has been proven that Germany and Russia in the first few months of war murdered almost whole elite of Poland preparing for subsequent after the war taking over. After the war was over, nationalists where being hunted down and killed for another 11 years. Communists took over the country till recently (year 1989). With the use of mainly Jewish minority Stalin trusted, new class of leaders was created, dynasties of which control Poland till today. That means that at least two most recent generations where fully immersed in the environment that does not promote righteousness, but rather corruption and collaboration with the use of non-compatible ethics of the neighboring countries, first Russian and then that of mainly Germans, all accomplished through the government security systems and media. Damage to the righteous psyche of Poles started for the most part about three centuries ago when money started to replace honor in the surrounding cultures. The changes did not omit Poland and Poland was the most vulnerable, with its freedoms and democracy unfamiliar to the neighboring countries. Dishonest individuals in such systems win. In consequence Poland was taken over by Prussia (Germany), Russia and Austria. For the next century Poland underwent destruction of its culture… again after about five generations in the year 1918 Poland was re-created with its principles of righteousness (diminished in the new world, but still higher than our neighbors). For the next 20 years Poland was being re-born in its culture of righteousness, diminished to some level by raising anti-polish forces of freemasonry and other internal and external powers. Recent three centuries where the ones that define decline of righteous psyche of Poland but previous centuries where opposite of that. In the last centuries of writings of some polish thinkers, we see statements where intelligencia with its genealogical peasant roots is valued higher than that of the noble origin for the reason of being less compromising of the ethical values. This we see also today where todays leaders are in line with international rather than national values. The true inteligencia from before the WWII was either killed or replaced… Today we have young people that are patriotic in spite of last 70 years of indoctrination of internationalism and babysitting of EU. In the neighboring countries that is not the case, social engineering worked there as predicted, people need and want government parenting. So what happened in Poland? R1a1a7 happened, this is protoplastic and oldest gen and is in most Poles unlike in other countries where in the West there is 0% of it. It is that gen that gave Poles unsuppressed bases for subconscious acting on patriotism, despite of elites being killed, the vessel of R1a1a7 is large and it does not matter whether leaders are considered noble or peasant, the basis of what means to be human in Poland is still the same. 

Latin Culture of Poland and Catholicism

In order to better understand presented here thesis, I would like to send reader to the work of Feliks Koneczny. He looks at the cultures of Poland and her neighbors from the distance of the last millennia creating most complete view of culture and anthropology. He uses all available resources where most prominent are the chronicles countries involved. I would like to expand on the views of Koneczny beyond the one-thousand-year mark, as it is essential to know that Catholicism started in Poland as a formal religion thousand years ago and it is important on what background it was dropped. Presence of Slavs is dated on the territories of Poland, Europe and Mediterranean as far as the oldest known civilizations and possibly beyond - this is particularly visible using haplogroups DNA evidence. Not going into the details of the culture of Slavs from this old period, it is sufficient to know that politically it was pretty flat structure, there where kings, princes and leaders but they come from electorate in the elections organized in the form of rallies. Kids upbringing was based on truthfulness, righteousness and fighting skills. Basis of that culture was still intact till Catholicism era or about 1000AD. Now what principles of Catholicism and that of pagan Slavs have in common? Surprisingly a lot. As per Koneczny’s thesis, history is left not to a chance but rather to a slow processes of culture creation of people involved, here we have similar situation; culture of Slavs as pagans is based on freedom of individual and Catholicism is exactly that, you are free to make your decision based on common understanding of what ethic of every human is. Unlike other cultures, culture of Slaves was not tainted with the human blood of sacrifices and so is Catholicism, slavery was also not part of the culture. All this allow for relatively easy transfer into the catholic religion and its survival in Poland till today, that has no rival in Europe. Let’s compare the situation in our neighboring countries. Both Germany and Russia suffered in past from monarchical systems where monarch was unquestioned superior of lower casts people, slavery was a standard. Koneczny describes this well as Turanian civilization of Russia and Byzantium civilization of Germany. It is necessary also to mention third important civilization that played role here, it is Jewish civilization, with its relative ethics where good and bad can’t be defined. All three civilizations are incompatible with the culture of Slavs and absolute definition of ethics provided by first pagan and then Catholic culture of Slavs stationed in today’s Poland. I would also risk a statement that even democracy of Roman Empire (similar EU today) with its build-in corruption and cosmopolitanism is not a good base for Catholicism. Not only conscious decision of everyday life of us, humans define who we really are, but also (and perhaps more importantly) our subconscious being molds us into who we really are and what conscious decisions we are taking. That element of Poland and Poles was created through millennia and last few decades of modernism will not mold Poles into what rest of the World seems to becoming.